Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United States

34 Ct. Int'l Trade 206, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1348

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedJuly 1, 2010

DocketCourt No. 03-00537

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 206 (Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United States, 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 206, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (cit 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

WALLACH, Judge:

Upon consideration of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) Remand Decision in this action (“Remand Decision”), which Defendant filed pursuant to- the court’s Order and Judgment dated January 13, 2009, and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Remand Decision, in which Plaintiff states that it has “no objection to the remand”; Plaintiff having requested that the court “. . . issue an Orderdirecting [Customs] to reliquidate the entries that are the subject of this action in accordance with this Court’s determination in Slip. Op. 09-04 (Jan. 13, 2009) and the Remand Decision, and issue duty refunds to plaintiff with interest as required by law”; the court having reviewed all pleadings and papers on file herein; and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby

[207]*207ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Remand Decision is consistent with the court’s determination in Slip Op. 09-04; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Remand Decision is AFFIRMED; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Customs shall reli-quidate the entries that are the subject of this action in accordance with the court’s determination in Slip Op. 09-04 and the Remand Decision, and issue duty refunds to Plaintiff with interest as required by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

WALLACH, Judge:

Upon consideration of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) Remand Decision in this action (“Remand Decision”), which Defendant filed pursuant to- the court’s Order and Judgment dated January 13, 2009, and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Remand Decision, in which Plaintiff states that it has “no objection to the remand”; Plaintiff having requested that the court “. . . issue an Orderdirecting [Customs] to reliquidate the entries that are the subject of this action in accordance with this Court’s determination in Slip. Op. 09-04 (Jan. 13, 2009) and the Remand Decision, and issue duty refunds to plaintiff with interest as required by law”; the court having reviewed all pleadings and papers on file herein; and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby

[207]*207ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Remand Decision is consistent with the court’s determination in Slip Op. 09-04; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Remand Decision is AFFIRMED; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Customs shall reli-quidate the entries that are the subject of this action in accordance with the court’s determination in Slip Op. 09-04 and the Remand Decision, and issue duty refunds to Plaintiff with interest as required by law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ct. Int'l Trade 206, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peerless-clothing-international-inc-v-united-states-cit-2010.