Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies Sa
This text of Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies Sa (Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies Sa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1069
PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC., and EBAY, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Michael T. Cooke, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan T. Suder. Of counsel on the brief were Edward R. Nelson, III, and Steven W. Hartsell, Nelson Bumgardner Casto, P.C., of Fort Worth, Texas. Of counsel was Stephen D. Susman, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., of Houston, Texas.
Andrei Iancu, Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Morgan Chu, Alan J. Heinrich and Benjamin T. Wang.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Judge Leonard Davis NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1069
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
in CASE NO(S). 6:06-CV-370.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, RADER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED October 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies Sa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peer-communications-corp-v-skype-technologies-sa-cafc-2009.