Peer Bearing Co. v. United States

2002 CIT 53
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peer Bearing Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 F. Supp. 2d 1285
United States Court of International Trade·Decided June 5, 2002·No. Consol. 97-03-00419·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 02-53

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS ___________________________________ : PEER BEARING COMPANY, : : Plaintiff and : Defendant-Intervenor, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : Consolidated : Court No. 97-03-00419 THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor and : Plaintiff, : : and : : L & S BEARING COMPANY; : SHANGHAI GENERAL BEARING CO., LTD.,: : Defendant-Intervenors. : ___________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand: Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,

from the People’s Republic of China (“Remand Results”), issued

pursuant to the Court’s order in Peer Bearing Co. v. United States,

25 CIT ___, 182 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (2001), and the responses by The

Timken Company and Peer Bearing Company, and Commerce having Consol. Court No. 97-03-00419 Page 2

complied with the Court’s remand, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on March 26,

2002, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

___________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: June 5, 2002 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peer Bearing Co. v. United States, 2002 CIT 53 (cit 2002).

2002 CIT 53 (Peer Bearing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peer Bearing Co. v. United States
182 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (Court of International Trade, 2001)