Peeples v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peeples v. State

645 So. 2d 555, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11348, 1994 WL 637696

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peeples v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10018 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1994·No. No. 94-03224·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Peeples appeals the denial, by stamp, of his motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Since Peeples’ motion is not properly sworn, we reverse and remand for entry of an order dismissing Peeples’ motion without prejudice to refile a properly sworn motion. See Williams v. State, 561 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Peeples appeals the denial, by stamp, of his motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Since Peeples’ motion is not properly sworn, we reverse and remand for entry of an order dismissing Peeples’ motion without prejudice to refile a properly sworn motion. See Williams v. State, 561 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Peeples v. State, 645 So. 2d 555, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11348, 1994 WL 637696 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

645 So. 2d 555 (Peeples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related