Peeples v. Peeples

19 Ill. 269
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Breese, J.

The question in this case is as to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Coles county.

The record shows that complainant was a resident of Edgar county when the bill was filed, and the defendant a resident of Hancock county, to which the process was sent from Coles. The domicil of both parties when living together, and at the time of abandonment by defendant, was Coles county.

The defendant appeared to the suit and filed his answer, and submitted his defense on the merits. No objection was made to the jurisdiction of the court until after trial and verdict, when a motion was made to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.

The Circuit Courts have general jurisdiction of the subject of divorces, and the defendant in this case voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction over his person.

The objection being of a dilatory character, should have been made before trial, by motion or by plea in abatement — answering to the merits, waives the objection. Gillilan v. Gray, 14 Ill. R. 416.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peeples v. Peeples, 19 Ill. 269 (Ill. 1857).

19 Ill. 269 (Peeples v. Peeples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chrastka v. Chrastka
277 N.E.2d 729 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1971)
People Ex Rel. Bradley v. McAuliffe
179 N.E.2d 616 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1962)
Becklenberg v. Becklenberg
83 N.E. 423 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1907)
Sommers v. Sommers
16 Ill. App. 77 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Way v. Way
64 Ill. 406 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1872)
Parker v. Parker
61 Ill. 369 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)