Peeples v. Mullins

168 S.E. 785, 176 Ga. 743, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 276
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 18, 1933
DocketNo. 9300
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 S.E. 785 (Peeples v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peeples v. Mullins, 168 S.E. 785, 176 Ga. 743, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 276 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “The general rule is that the courts of this State have no extraterritorial jurisdiction, and can not hold citizens of other States amenable to its process, or bind them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.” Irons v. American National Bank, 175 Ga. 552 (165 S. E. 741), and cit.

2. The court did not err in setting' aside the order declaring service perfected by publication on the defendant Mullins, and in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Gobi & Bright and George G. McCoy, for plaintiff. Abrahams, Bouhan, Atkinson & Lawrence, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb & Martin Inc. v. Anderson-Mcgriff Hardware Co.
3 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Pendley v. Tumlin
184 S.E. 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 785, 176 Ga. 743, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peeples-v-mullins-ga-1933.