Peelle v. Board of Commissioners

48 Ind. 127
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Ind. 127 (Peelle v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peelle v. Board of Commissioners, 48 Ind. 127 (Ind. 1874).

Opinion

Buskirk, C. J.

This was a proceeding on the part of the appellant, to enjoin the appellee from removing the county-seat of Wayne county from Centerville to Richmond. Since a rehearing was granted in this cause, the case of The Board of Comm’rs of Clay Co. v. Markle, 46 Ind. 96, which involved the validity of the proceedings which had resulted in the removal of the county-seat of Clay, has been decided. In that case, every question involved in the present case was fully considered and decided against the appellant in the case under examination. In that case, there was no finding rendered by the board of commissioners, while in this case there is a finding ; and surely if the proceedings in that case were valid, those had in the present case must be so held for a stronger [128]*128reason than in that case. The questions involved here having been so fully and elaborately considered in that case, there-is no necessity for a re-examination or re-statement of them in this case.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, for the reasons- and upon the grounds stated in the above cited case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Commissioners v. Conner
58 N.E. 828 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Ind. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peelle-v-board-of-commissioners-ind-1874.