Peelle Co. v. Raskin
This text of 199 A.D. 938 (Peelle Co. v. Raskin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. On the face of the complaint this action in the last analysis is an action based upon a contract, and is not an action to enjoin infringement of the patent. If the plaintiff succeeds, the relief granted should be such as is proper in an action based upon a breach of contract. (Wise v. Tube Bending Machine Co., 194 N. Y. 272; Hyatt v. Ingalls, 124 id. 93; Herzog v. Heyman, 151 id. 587; Comerma Co. v. Comerma, 182 App. Div. 576.) Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Maiming, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peelle-co-v-raskin-nyappdiv-1921.