Peelegrine v. Sullivan
Opinions
The plaintiff appeals from summary judgments for the defendants in a lawsuit alleging counseling malpractice; alienation of affections; breach of contract; the tort of outrage; vicarious liability; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; fraud; intentional infliction of emotional distress; breach of fiduciary duty; and loss of consortium. Because our study of the record on appeal discloses no genuine issue of material fact, and because the facts as shown by that record entitle the defendants to judgments as a matter of law, we [407] affirm the summary judgments. Rule 56(c), Ala.R.Civ.P.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
741 So. 2d 406 (Peelegrine v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.