Peelegrine v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Peelegrine v. Sullivan

741 So. 2d 406, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 240, 1999 WL 701665

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 10, 1999

Docket1971882 and 1980276

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 741 So. 2d 406 (Peelegrine v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peelegrine v. Sullivan, 741 So. 2d 406, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 240, 1999 WL 701665 (Ala. 1999).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from summary judgments for the defendants in a lawsuit alleging counseling malpractice; alienation of affections; breach of contract; the tort of outrage; vicarious liability; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; fraud; intentional infliction of emotional distress; breach of fiduciary duty; and loss of consortium. Because our study of the record on appeal discloses no genuine issue of material fact, and because the facts as shown by that record entitle the defendants to judgments as a matter of law, we [407]*407affirm the summary judgments. Rule 56(c), Ala.R.Civ.P.

AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur. MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., concur specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from summary judgments for the defendants in a lawsuit alleging counseling malpractice; alienation of affections; breach of contract; the tort of outrage; vicarious liability; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; fraud; intentional infliction of emotional distress; breach of fiduciary duty; and loss of consortium. Because our study of the record on appeal discloses no genuine issue of material fact, and because the facts as shown by that record entitle the defendants to judgments as a matter of law, we [407]*407affirm the summary judgments. Rule 56(c), Ala.R.Civ.P.

AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur. MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., concur specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 So. 2d 406, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 240, 1999 WL 701665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peelegrine-v-sullivan-ala-1999.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack