Peele v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-269-GCM-DCK DONNELL LASHON PEELE, ) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendant’s “Motion For Summary Judgment” (Document No. 13) filed May 6, 2021. In accordance with Roseboro y. Garrison, 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant’s motion. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file his own motion for summary judgment, which was due by March 8, 2021, or any response to Defendant’s “Motion For Summary Judgment” (Document No. 13). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a motion for extension of time, file a motion for summary judgment and/or a response to Defendant’s motion, that explains his failure to make appropriate and timely filings in support of his claims, on or before June 24, 2021. Failure to file a timely and persuasive motion will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. SO ORDERED.

Signed: June 10, 2021

I ont David C. Keesler ee United States Magistrate Judge vet