Peel v. State
229 So. 2d 892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 1970·No. No. 69-514·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See this court’s opinion at 210 So.2d 14. In addition, this is the second motion for similar relief and as noted in the trial judge’s order there has been no new ground set forth by appellant. CrPR 1.850, 3 F.S.A. expressly provides that the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peel v. State, 229 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
229 So. 2d 892 (Peel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chapman v. State
417 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Moore v. State
324 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
State v. Davis
290 So. 2d 30 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Franklin v. State
229 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)