Peel v. State
229 So. 2d 892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1970
DocketNo. 69-514
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 229 So. 2d 892 (Peel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peel v. State, 229 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
Opinion
Affirmed. See this court’s opinion at 210 So.2d 14. In addition, this is the second motion for similar relief and as noted in the trial judge’s order there has been no new ground set forth by appellant. CrPR 1.850, 3 F.S.A. expressly provides that the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chapman v. State
417 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Moore v. State
324 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
State v. Davis
290 So. 2d 30 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Franklin v. State
229 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 So. 2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peel-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.