Peel v. Jordan

202 A.D.2d 485, 609 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2467
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated December 16, 1991, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff’s subjective complaints of ringing in the ear, and her minor bruises, are insufficient to make out a prima facie case of "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the court should have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the [486]*486complaint (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Scheer v Koubek, 70 NY2d 678; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peel v. Jordan, 202 A.D.2d 485, 609 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 485 (Peel v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Black v. Gordon
2019 NY Slip Op 4032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Congdon v. Preisman
263 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)