Peel v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank

1 White & W. 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 1881
DocketNo. 1574, Op. Book No. 3, p. 660
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 71 (Peel v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peel v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank, 1 White & W. 71 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 180. Garnishee; not liable on negotiable note, unless, etc. It is impossible to charge the garnishee as the debtor [72]*72of the defendant, unless it appear affirmatively that at the time of the garnishment the defendant had a cause of action against him for the recovery of a legal debt due or to become due by afflux of time. Thus, where the garnishee answered that he had executed to the defendant a negotiable promissory note, upon which he still owed a balance, it devolved upon the plaintiff to prove, in order to hold the garnishee liable, that the note had been transferred by the defendant before the service of the writ of garnishment. [Drake on Attach. § 575; Bassett v. Garthwaite, 22 Tex. 230; Iglehart v. Moore, 21 Tex. 501.]

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iglehart v. Moore
21 Tex. 501 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)
Bassett v. Garthwaite, Griffin & Co.
22 Tex. 230 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peel-v-farmers-merchants-bank-texapp-1881.