Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan Railroad v. Village of Peekskill
59 N.E. 1128, 165 N.Y. 628, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1452
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Curtis v. Van Bergh (161 N. Y. 47) and Ward v. Hudson River Building Co. (125 N. Y. 230).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Bbien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan Railroad v. Village of Peekskill, 59 N.E. 1128, 165 N.Y. 628, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1452 (N.Y. 1901).
59 N.E. 1128 (Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan Railroad v. Village of Peekskill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
South Shore Traction Co. v. Town of Brookhaven
116 A.D. 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
144 F. 458 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York, 1906)
Hattersly v. Waterville (Vil.)
16 Ohio C.C. Dec. 226 (Lucas Circuit Court, 1904)