Peekskill Savings Bank v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peekskill Savings Bank v. Schwartz

235 A.D. 641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 641 (Peekskill Savings Bank v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peekskill Savings Bank v. Schwartz, 235 A.D. 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order directing payment of rents to receiver, and order upon reargument, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The rents were collected by the owner’s agent before the receiver’s appointment and, therefore, are the property of the owner of the equity. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order directing payment of rents to receiver, and order upon reargument, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The rents were collected by the owner’s agent before the receiver’s appointment and, therefore, are the property of the owner of the equity. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peekskill-savings-bank-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1932.