Peek v. State

610 So. 2d 5, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11489, 1992 WL 312850
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1992·No. No. 91-2872·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentences are REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing in compliance with the habitual offender statute. Jones v. State, 606 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The trial court is reminded that section 775.084, Florida Statutes, no longer applies to misdemeanor offenses, and that the sentence for the third degree felony may not exceed the ten year statutory maximum.

ERVIN, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion for certification is granted. The question previously certified in Jones v. State, 606 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), is certified in the instant case.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

BARFIELD, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peek v. State, 610 So. 2d 5, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11489, 1992 WL 312850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 5 (Peek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peek v. State
619 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Peek
616 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)