Peek v. Frame
19 F. Cas. 97, 9 Blatchf. 194, 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 113, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1760
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedOctober 26, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 19 F. Cas. 97 (Peek v. Frame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peek v. Frame, 19 F. Cas. 97, 9 Blatchf. 194, 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 113, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1760 (circtsdny 1871).
Opinion
I regarded the conduct of the defendants, as disclosed on the trial, as peculiarly aggravated, and find no reason for changing my opinion. The damages ought to be increased by a sum sufficient to cover the expenses of the trial, and something more, for the time and trouble of .the plaintiffs. Let the damages be increased to $7,500.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Welling v. La Bau
35 F. 302 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 F. Cas. 97, 9 Blatchf. 194, 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 113, 1871 U.S. App. LEXIS 1760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peek-v-frame-circtsdny-1871.