Peek v. City of Atlanta
70 S.E. 140, 8 Ga. App. 852, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
Opinion
1. There was no error in overruling the certiorari.
2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant for violating what is known as the “traveling blind-tiger ordinance” of the city of Atlanta. All the assignments of error other than that the conviction of the defendant was contrary to evidence are controlled by the rulings in Callaway v. Mims, 5 Ga. App. 9 (62 S. E. 654), Athens v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 244 (64 S. E. 711), Allen v. Jennings, 134 Ga. 338 (67 S. E. 883), and Loeb v. Jennings, 133 Ga. 796 (67 S. E. 101).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peek v. City of Atlanta, 70 S.E. 140, 8 Ga. App. 852, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 140 (Peek v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loeb v. Jennings
67 S.E. 101 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Allen v. Jennings
67 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Callaway v. Mims
62 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Athens v. City of Atlanta
64 S.E. 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)