Peeil v. Hasselbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peeil v. Hasselbush

249 A.D. 766, 291 N.Y.S. 1011, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5909

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out paragraph 2 of the amended answer and to strike out the defendants’ entire amended answer and for summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The undertaking on appeal, given pursuant to section 598 of the Civil Practice Act, is to be read in the light of section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act, which last-mentioned section is invoked in the paragraph of the answer sought to be struck out by the plaintiff. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out paragraph 2 of the amended answer and to strike out the defendants’ entire amended answer and for summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The undertaking on appeal, given pursuant to section 598 of the Civil Practice Act, is to be read in the light of section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act, which last-mentioned section is invoked in the paragraph of the answer sought to be struck out by the plaintiff. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Peeil v. Hasselbush, 249 A.D. 766, 291 N.Y.S. 1011, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 766 (Peeil v. Hasselbush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.