Peed v. Peed
330 S.E.2d 612, 313 N.C. 604, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1831
This text of 330 S.E.2d 612 (Peed v. Peed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peed v. Peed, 330 S.E.2d 612, 313 N.C. 604, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1831 (N.C. 1985).
Opinion
Darlene PEED (now Bennett)
v.
William Linton PEED.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Edmundson & Catherwood, Oxford, for defendant.
Watkins, Finch & Hopper, Oxford, for plaintiff.
Defendant's petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
330 S.E.2d 612, 313 N.C. 604, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peed-v-peed-nc-1985.