Peebles v. Stillman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peebles v. Stillman

331 So. 2d 325, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14145

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peebles v. Stillman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 11447 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1976·No. No. X-525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appearance of this case, on one or another of its facets; Peebles v. Kilday, Fla.App., 257 So.2d 627; Peebles v. Smith, Fla.App., 291 So.2d 102; Peebles v. Stillman, Fla.App., 296 So.2d 671, cert. denied, Fla., 303 So.2d 640. We have reviewed the record, read the briefs and heard oral arguments, and the Appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the judgment below is AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., RAWLS, J., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appearance of this case, on one or another of its facets; Peebles v. Kilday, Fla.App., 257 So.2d 627; Peebles v. Smith, Fla.App., 291 So.2d 102; Peebles v. Stillman, Fla.App., 296 So.2d 671, cert. denied, Fla., 303 So.2d 640. We have reviewed the record, read the briefs and heard oral arguments, and the Appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the judgment below is AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., RAWLS, J., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge, concur.

Peebles v. Stillman, 331 So. 2d 325, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

331 So. 2d 325 (Peebles v. Stillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related