Peebles v. State
129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 568, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174
Opinion
The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peebles v. State, 129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 568, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
129 So. 308 (Peebles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.