Peebles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Peebles v. State

129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 568, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 24, 1930

Docket8 Div. 44.

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 308 (Peebles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peebles v. State, 129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 568, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 308, 23 Ala. App. 568, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-state-alactapp-1930.