Peebles v. State
104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692
Opinion
It could serve no good purpose to recite the evidence as shown by the record. After an examination of the entire evidénee, we are of the opinion that the defendant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rulings of the court upon the admission of testimony were also without error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peebles v. State, 104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
104 So. 924 (Peebles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Peebles
104 So. 917 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)