Peebles v. State
104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692
This text of 104 So. 924 (Peebles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peebles v. State, 104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
It could serve no good purpose to recite the evidence as shown by the record. After an examination of the entire evidénee, we are of the opinion that the defendant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rulings of the court upon the admission of testimony were also without error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ex Parte Peebles
104 So. 917 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-state-alactapp-1925.