Peebles v. Sheridan Healthcare, Inc.
733 So. 2d 1140, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7543, 1999 WL 371347
Opinion
Affirmed. Finkelstein v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 490 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Hiles v. Auto Bahn Federation, Inc., 498 So.2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Mary Dee’s, Inc. v. Tartamella, 492 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Action Elec. & Repair, Inc. v. Batelli, 416 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peebles v. Sheridan Healthcare, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1140, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7543, 1999 WL 371347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
733 So. 2d 1140 (Peebles v. Sheridan Healthcare, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mary Dee's, Inc. v. Tartamella
492 So. 2d 815 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Action Electric & Repair, Inc. v. Batelli
416 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Hiles v. Auto Bahn Federation, Inc.
498 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Hausbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A.
490 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)