Peebles v. MHM Support Servs.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Peebles v. MHM Support Servs.

556 S.W.3d 673

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 18, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106314

StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 673 (Peebles v. MHM Support Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peebles v. MHM Support Servs., 556 S.W.3d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Yvette Peebles appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("the Commission") denying her unemployment benefits. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*674The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Yvette Peebles appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("the Commission") denying her unemployment benefits. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*674The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-mhm-support-servs-moctapp-2018.