Peebles v. Farrar
This text of 73 N.C. 342 (Peebles v. Farrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
His Honor assuming the evidence to be true, (about which it seems no question was made,) instructed the j ury that the receipt of the cotton by the defendant of the plaintiff, with an express promise on the part of the defendant that he would take care of the cotton for the plaintiff) constituted the relation of “ bailor and bailee.” There can be no doubt about that. His Honor further instructed the jury that a bailee is not allowed to dispute the title of his bailor and set up title in himself. This is familiar learning. The matter is too plain for discussion.
No error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 N.C. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-farrar-nc-1875.