Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Pedro v. Hoyt

Pedro v. Hoyt

27 P.3d 169, 175 Or. App. 289, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 909
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
Docket99C-17403; A108954
StatusPublished

This text of 27 P.3d 169 (Pedro v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pedro v. Hoyt, 27 P.3d 169, 175 Or. App. 289, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 909 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Hamel v. Johnson, 173 Or App 448, 25 P3d 314 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamel v. Johnson
25 P.3d 314 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 P.3d 169, 175 Or. App. 289, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedro-v-hoyt-orctapp-2001.