Pedro Sales v. Justiniano
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31660(U) (Pedro Sales v. Justiniano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pedro Sales v Justiniano 2025 NY Slip Op 31660(U) May 7, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 452906/2024 Judge: Ashlee Crawford Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 452906/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ASHLEE CRAWFORD PART 38 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 452906/2024 PEDRO SALES, RODRIGO CANDIA, MELCHOR GALINDO, JAIRO RAMIREZ, DANIEL LOPEZ MOTION DATE 12/23/2024
Plaintiffs, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ _ _0_02_ __
- V - DECISION+ ORDER ON ALMINDA JUSTINIANO, JUSTAL REALTY GROUP, INC, MOTION Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 11 , I 2, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, I 8, 19,20, 21,22, 23,24,25,31 , 32,33,34,35,39, 41 , 49,50,51 were read on this motion to/for INJUNCTION/ RESTRAINI NG ORDER
Upon the foregoing documents, it is
Plaintiffs Pedro Sales, Jairo Ramirez, and Daniel Lopez move by order to show cause for
a preliminary injunction (1) requiring defendants to correct the open violations and alleged
conditions in plaintiffs' individual apartments and the common areas of the building located at
306 E 116th Street, New York, New York; (2) requiring defendants to cease from engaging in
repair-related harassment; and (3) barring defendants from refusing to inspect and repair
plaintiffs' apartments and to correct the open violations.
Under CPLR 6301, "[t]he party seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate a
probability of success on the merits, danger of irreparable injury in the absence of an injunction
and a balance of the equities in its favor" (Nobu Next Door, LLC v Fine Arts Housing. Inc., 4
NY3d 839, 840 [2005]).
452906/2024 SALES, PEDRO ET AL vs. JUSTINIANO, ALMINDA ET AL Page 1 of 3 Motion No. 002
[* 1] 1 of 3 INDEX NO. 452906/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2025
Repairs and Open Violations
In accordance with the Court' s ruling on the record on April 23, 2025, the first and third
prongs of plaintiffs' order to show cause are GRANTED and the parties are directed as follows:
(I) Within ten days of entry of this order, the parties shall upload a stipulation containing
their agreement on firm dates for defendants or their agent(s) to access plaintiffs'
apartments for the purpose of conducting repairs and/or inspections, including in
furtherance of clearing any open violations; and
(2) On the agreed-upon access dates, plaintiffs or their designated agents shall provide
access to their apartments for the reasons set forth above in section ( I); and
(3) Through the resolution of this action, the parties shall work in good faith to faci litate
continued access to the subject apartments for the reasons set forth above in section
( I ).
Repair-Related Harassment
The second prong of plaintiffs order to show cause, requiring defendants to cease from
engaging in repair-related harassment, is also GRANTED. As set forth in the Housing
Maintenance Code, the owner of a dwelling shall not harass any tenants or persons lawfully
entitled to occupancy of such dwelling (New York City, N .Y., Code§ 27-2005[d]).
·'Harassment'" is defined to include, among other things, an interruption or discontinuance of an
essential service, and repeated failures to correct hazardous or immediately hazardous code
violations, which plaintiffs allege (id. at§ 27-2004[a][48]; NYSCEF Doc. I at 1112, 41-43
[Complaint]; see also NYSCEF Doc. 48 at 11 12, 42-44 [Amended Complaint]). Plaintiffs meet
their burden under CPLR 6301 with respect to their harassment claim.
452906/2024 SALES, PEDRO ET AL vs. JUSTINIANO, ALMINDA ET AL Page 2 of 3 Motion No. 002
[* 2] 2 of 3 INDEX NO. 452906/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2025
Certificate of Occupancy & Escrow Account
Additionally, within 20 days of entry of this order, the parties shall file letter briefs via
NYSCEF, and email copies to Court Attorney Daniel Kessler at dkessler@nycourts.gov,
addressing the Court's sua sponte ruling on February 26, 2025, which directed plaintiffs to place
their rent payments in an escrow account maintained by plaintiffs' counsel, due to the undisputed
lack of certificate of occupancy for the bui lding. As agreed on the record by counsel for the
parties, plaintiffs' counsel shall provide to defendants' counsel an accounting of the escrow
funds; such accountings shall be provided on a monthly basis until further order of the Court.
All parties, including defendant Alminda Justiniano, shall appear for a virtual status
conference on June 25, 2025, at 2:15 PM.
This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
5/7/2025 DATE CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
□ DENIED □ OTHER
D GRANTED GRANTED IN PART
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
452906/2024 SALES, PEDRO ET AL vs. JUSTINIANO, ALMINDA ET AL Page 3 of 3 Motion No. 002
[* 3] 3 of 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 31660(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedro-sales-v-justiniano-nysupctnewyork-2025.