Pedro Romero v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: November 14, 2007
• Docket: 04-07-00324-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-07-00324-CR

Pedro ROMERO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CR-5516 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 14, 2007

AFFIRMED

Pedro Romero pled true to violating a condition of his community supervision in response to the State's motion to revoke community supervision. Romero appeals from the revocation of his community supervision. Romero's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal is without merit. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Romero, who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Romero did not file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's Anders brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

DO NOT PUBLISH