PEDRO ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

PEDRO ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2018

Docket18-1840

StatusPublished

This text of PEDRO ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (PEDRO ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PEDRO ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

PEDRO ROMAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1840

[October 31, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2011CF006736B.

Pedro Roman, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post- conviction relief without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court to obtain his records and trial transcripts. See Bush v. State, 947 So. 2d 685, 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI