Pedro Jimenez v. State
This text of Pedro Jimenez v. State (Pedro Jimenez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 22, 2021
No. 04-21-00060-CR
Pedro JIMENEZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR8610 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding
ORDER
On November 4, 2019, in related plea bargain cases, the trial court sentenced Pedro Jimenez in accordance with the plea agreements. On November 6, 2019, Jimenez filed notices of appeal. On January 7, 2020, this court ordered Jimenez to show cause why his cases should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Jimenez filed no response, and on March 4, 2020, this court dismissed Jimenez’s appeals for want of jurisdiction because he had no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Jimenez v. State, No. 04-19-00802-CR, 2020 WL 1036432, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 4, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Jimenez v. State, No. 04-19-00803-CR, 2020 WL 1036435, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 4, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandates in each appeal issued on August 19, 2020. On January 14, 2021, Appellant filed notices of appeal with the trial court, noting inadequate counsel, bias against the client, and breach of the plea agreement. However, the appeal is untimely, and Appellant’s right-of-appeal status has not changed. In general, out-of-time complaints of ineffective assistance of counsel must be referred to the Court of Criminal Appeals to obtain permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. See, e.g., Ex parte Florentino, 206 S.W.3d 124, 125 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also Fontenot v. State, No. 01-91-00910-CR, 1991 WL 235320, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 14, 1991, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Ex parte Dietzman, 790 S.W.2d 305, 307 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)). Without permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider an out-of-time case. See Fontenot, 1991 WL 235320, at *1 (citing Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)); see also Kossie v. State, No. 01-16-00738-CR, 2017 WL 631842, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 16, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)). Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within ten days of the date of this order why these appeals should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If Appellant fails to show cause within the time provided, the appeals will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). All other appellate deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of this court.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2021.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pedro Jimenez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedro-jimenez-v-state-texapp-2021.