Pedro E. Velez v. Vilma Inez Andrews
This text of Pedro E. Velez v. Vilma Inez Andrews (Pedro E. Velez v. Vilma Inez Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 16, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00780-CV ——————————— PEDRO E. VELEZ, Appellant V. VILMA INES ANDREWS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2004-66968
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Pedro E. Velez, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases
in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or
made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant
did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pedro E. Velez v. Vilma Inez Andrews, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedro-e-velez-v-vilma-inez-andrews-texapp-2014.