Pedro Chay, Mario Soto and David Bonito v. Penske Truck Leasing Company, L.P. and Peter Johnson

Opinion

Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately

respond. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 37.3(b),

42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Lloyd.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-18-00646-CV ——————————— PEDRO CHAY, MARIO SOTO, AND DAVID BONITO, Appellants V. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY, L.P. AND PETER JOHNSON, Appellees On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017-64561 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Pedro Chay, Mario Soto, and David Bonito, have neither established indigence for purposes of appellate costs nor arranged to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145, TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After