Pedro Anthony Perez, Jr. v. United States

303 F.2d 441, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5076
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1962·No. 19452_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Pedro Anthony Perez, Jr., was convicted on the trial for one offense and entered a plea of guilty of another. He seeks, by a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, to have the sentences imposed against him set aside on the ground that the grand jury which indicted him was composed only of persons who were registered voters on the rolls of the State. The district court denied the motion. The objection, if it be a valid one, can be availed of only before trial. It cannot be asserted in a proceeding under Section 2255. Rule 12 Fed.Rules of Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A.; United States ex rel. Jackson v. Brady, 4th Cir. 1943, 133 F.2d 476, cert. den. 319 U.S. 746, 63 S.Ct. 1029, 87 L.Ed. 1702, reh. den. 319 U.S. 784, 63 S.Ct. 1315, 87 L.Ed. 1727. The order of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pedro Anthony Perez, Jr. v. United States, 303 F.2d 441, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5076 (5th Cir. 1962).

303 F.2d 441 (Pedro Anthony Perez, Jr. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Frank Houser and Winnie Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Foxworth v. State
267 So. 2d 647 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Foxworth v. Wainwright
319 F. Supp. 593 (N.D. Florida, 1970)
Fernando P. Bustillo v. United States
421 F.2d 131 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Hayes v. Wainwright
302 F. Supp. 716 (N.D. Florida, 1969)
Willie Jackson v. United States
394 F.2d 114 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Jesse James Gilbert v. United States
366 F.2d 923 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)