Pedrick v. Fisher

19 F. Cas. 92, 1 Sprague 565

This text of 19 F. Cas. 92 (Pedrick v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pedrick v. Fisher, 19 F. Cas. 92, 1 Sprague 565 (circtdma 1859).

Opinion

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

held that Ped-riek had an insurable interest, either under the name of primage, or wages, or commissions, but that the owners were not bound to insure it for him, without request; and that the letter of instructions contained no promise, express or implied, on the part of the owners so to insure; and that if they had insured without the master’s authority, he would not have been liable to them for the premium paid; and, on the second point, that no freight having been earned, and none collected, no primage was to be paid; that money received from insurance, as indemnity, was not to be deemed freight collected; that the amount, in fact, obtained from the insurance companies, was by virtue of a distinct contract between the owners and the companies, to which the master was not a party, for which the owners alone paid the consideration. and of which they alone were entitled to the benefit. Libel dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. Cas. 92, 1 Sprague 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedrick-v-fisher-circtdma-1859.