Pedretti v. Pedretti

Ohio Circuit Courts

Pedretti v. Pedretti

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 234

DecidedJuly 1, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 234 (Pedretti v. Pedretti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pedretti v. Pedretti, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 234 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

SWING, J.

This is an action in this court to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas, wherein that court refused to grant the motion of Galvin & Bauer, attorneys in the case for Raphael Pedretti, for compensation for services rendered the plaintiff and receiver and referee. The judgment entry recites that this motion was heard on testimony and was argued by counsel and the court being fully advised overrules said motion. The plaintiff excepted to the overruling of the motion, but no bill of exceptions was taken containing the evidence. Therefore this court cannot say whether the court decided the question correctly or not. A consideration of the evidence alone could show this. In the absence of this evidence, we must assume that the court decided the matter correctly. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWING, J.

This is an action in this court to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas, wherein that court refused to grant the motion of Galvin & Bauer, attorneys in the case for Raphael Pedretti, for compensation for services rendered the plaintiff and receiver and referee. The judgment entry recites that this motion was heard on testimony and was argued by counsel and the court being fully advised overrules said motion. The plaintiff excepted to the overruling of the motion, but no bill of exceptions was taken containing the evidence. Therefore this court cannot say whether the court decided the question correctly or not. A consideration of the evidence alone could show this. In the absence of this evidence, we must assume that the court decided the matter correctly. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedretti-v-pedretti-ohiocirct-1908.