Pedraza v. Perkins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 8, 1996·No. 95-40847·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40847 Summary Calendar

LEOPOLD LEE PEDRAZA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RONALD G. PERKINS, Chief of Police, City of Victoria Police Department,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-95-CV-76 - - - - - - - - - - May 21, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court’s § 1915(d) dismissal with prejudice of

Leopold Lee Pedraza’s suit because it was duplicative of another

action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court

with instructions to enter a § 1915(d) dismissal, without

prejudice to his right to pay the filing fee, because in forma

pauperis status is no longer financially appropriate for Pedraza.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. VACATED and REMANDED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pedraza v. Perkins, (5th Cir. 1996).

Pedraza v. Perkins (Pedraza v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.