Pedrajo v. Sloane

405 So. 2d 1058, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21676
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1981·No. No. 80-1407·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment entered for the defendants upon a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in an action for false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Our review of the record in the required light most favorable to the appellant1 discloses the existence of a prima facie case and therefore of jury issues as to both theories. See e. g., Donner v. Hetherington, 399 So.2d 1011 (Fla.3d DCA 1981), and cases cited; Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So.2d 1164 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So.2d 377 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pedrajo v. Sloane, 405 So. 2d 1058, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

405 So. 2d 1058 (Pedrajo v. Sloane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dedmon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
408 So. 2d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)