Pedrajo v. Sloane
This text of 405 So. 2d 1058 (Pedrajo v. Sloane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the judgment entered for the defendants upon a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in an action for false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Our review of the record in the required light most favorable to the appellant1 discloses the existence of a prima facie case and therefore of jury issues as to both theories. See e. g., Donner v. Hetherington, 399 So.2d 1011 (Fla.3d DCA 1981), and cases cited; Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So.2d 1164 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So.2d 377 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 So. 2d 1058, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedrajo-v-sloane-fladistctapp-1981.