Pedigo v. Cressman

California Court of Appeal

Pedigo v. Cressman

87 P.2d 723, 31 Cal. App. 2d 233, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 621

California Court of Appeal·Decided February 24, 1939·No. Civ. No. 2244·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

This is an attempted appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County, sustaining the general demurrer of the respondent to appellant’s amended complaint.

An appeal does not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint and an attempted appeal from such an order will be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963; Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721 [265 Pac. 817] ; Harmon v. DeTurk, 176 Cal. 758, 761 [169 Pac. 680].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

This is an attempted appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County, sustaining the general demurrer of the respondent to appellant’s amended complaint.

An appeal does not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint and an attempted appeal from such an order will be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963; Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721 [265 Pac. 817] ; Harmon v. DeTurk, 176 Cal. 758, 761 [169 Pac. 680].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Pedigo v. Cressman, 87 P.2d 723, 31 Cal. App. 2d 233, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 621 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

87 P.2d 723 (Pedigo v. Cressman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related