Pedigo v. Cressman

California Court of Appeal

Pedigo v. Cressman

87 P.2d 723, 31 Cal. App. 2d 233, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 621

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 24, 1939

DocketCiv. No. 2244

StatusPublished

This text of 87 P.2d 723 (Pedigo v. Cressman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pedigo v. Cressman, 87 P.2d 723, 31 Cal. App. 2d 233, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 621 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

This is an attempted appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County, sustaining the general demurrer of the respondent to appellant’s amended complaint.

An appeal does not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint and an attempted appeal from such an order will be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963; Bryant v. Kelly, 203 Cal. 721 [265 Pac. 817] ; Harmon v. DeTurk, 176 Cal. 758, 761 [169 Pac. 680].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI