Pederson v. State
This text of 2013 ND 7 (Pederson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/23/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 7
Tate Allister Pederson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20120331
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Wickham Corwin, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bobbi B. Weiler, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Reid A. Brady and Tanya J. Martinez, Assistant State’s Attorneys, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Pederson v. State
[¶1] Tate Pederson appeals from a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Pederson argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pederson-v-state-nd-2013.