Pedersen v. Union Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pedersen v. Union Railway Co.

181 A.D. 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 A.D. 885 (Pedersen v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pedersen v. Union Railway Co., 181 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

As this cause was tried with the action of Pedersen v. Union Railway Co. (ante, p. 885), the recovery falls with that reversal, decided herewith. This judgment and order are, therefore, reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the defendant. Only one bill of costs for the two appeals. (Woodworth v. Brooklyn Elevated R. R. Co., 29 App. Div. 1, 3.) Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., concurred in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As this cause was tried with the action of Pedersen v. Union Railway Co. (ante, p. 885), the recovery falls with that reversal, decided herewith. This judgment and order are, therefore, reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the defendant. Only one bill of costs for the two appeals. (Woodworth v. Brooklyn Elevated R. R. Co., 29 App. Div. 1, 3.) Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., concurred in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedersen-v-union-railway-co-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack