Pedersen v. Town Board of Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pedersen v. Town Board of Woodbury

265 A.D.2d 416, 696 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10231

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 416 (Pedersen v. Town Board of Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pedersen v. Town Board of Woodbury, 265 A.D.2d 416, 696 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Woodbury dated September 18, 1997, which renamed a public street, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Smith, J.), dated June 23, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondent and intervenors-respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the petitioners’ arguments, the Supreme Court did not err in denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding (see, Town Law § 64 [9]; Bacon v Miller, 247 NY 311). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Woodbury dated September 18, 1997, which renamed a public street, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Smith, J.), dated June 23, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondent and intervenors-respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the petitioners’ arguments, the Supreme Court did not err in denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding (see, Town Law § 64 [9]; Bacon v Miller, 247 NY 311). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 416, 696 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedersen-v-town-board-of-woodbury-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack