Pedersen v. Schultz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Pedersen v. Schultz

176 N.W.2d 917, 185 Neb. 514, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 581

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1970·No. No. 37337·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals after return of a jury verdict for him, filing of an alternative motion by defendant for [515]*515judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and rendition of judgment noth withstanding the verdict. The judgment is affirmed. For affirmance: White, C. J., and Carter and Newton, JJ. For reversal and remand for a new trial: Spencer and Boslaugh, JJ. For reversal and remand with directions to render judgment on the jury verdict: Smith and McCown, JJ.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals after return of a jury verdict for him, filing of an alternative motion by defendant for [515]*515judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and rendition of judgment noth withstanding the verdict. The judgment is affirmed. For affirmance: White, C. J., and Carter and Newton, JJ. For reversal and remand for a new trial: Spencer and Boslaugh, JJ. For reversal and remand with directions to render judgment on the jury verdict: Smith and McCown, JJ.

Affirmed.

Pedersen v. Schultz, 176 N.W.2d 917, 185 Neb. 514, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 581 (Neb. 1970).

Pincite

176 N.W.2d 917 (Pedersen v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.