Peden v. Blackmon

258 So. 2d 49, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7193
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1972·No. No. O-226·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to [50]*50demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Matthews v. St. Petersburg Auto Auction, Inc. (Fla.App.1966) 190 So.2d 215; Cloud v. Fallis (Fla.1959) 110 So.2d 669; Lowenthal v. Laurent (Fla.App.1958) 102 So.2d 410; Hart v. Held (1941) 149 Fla. 33, 5 So.2d 878; Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peden v. Blackmon, 258 So. 2d 49, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

258 So. 2d 49 (Peden v. Blackmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Hart, Et Vir v. Held
5 So. 2d 878 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring
200 So. 376 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Lowenthal v. Laurent
102 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Matthews v. St. Petersburg Auto Auction, Inc.
190 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)