Pedeco, Inc. v. Mario Alonso Saenz

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2001
Docket13-01-00670-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Pedeco, Inc. v. Mario Alonso Saenz (Pedeco, Inc. v. Mario Alonso Saenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pedeco, Inc. v. Mario Alonso Saenz, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion


NUMBER 13-01-670-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

PEDECO, INC., Appellant,

v.


MARIO ALONSO SAENZ, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Yañez, and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam

On September 21, 2001, appellant, Pedeco, Inc., filed an emergency motion for stay of the trial setting in this cause. Appellant's emergency motion for stay was granted by this Court on September 21, 2001. A joint motion to dismiss the appeal has now been filed. In the motion, appellant and appellee, Mario Alonso Saenz, state that they have agreed to dismiss this interlocutory appeal and to lift the stay the Court had entered pending disposition of the appeal. The parties have further agreed that the dismissal of the appeal shall not constitute a waiver of any objection to venue that appellant has raised or may raise.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss by agreement, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The stay granted on September 21, 2001, is ordered lifted. The joint motion to dismiss the appeal by agreement is hereby GRANTED.

Furthermore, appellee's emergency motion to dissolve the stay and motion to dismiss the appeal and supplemental emergency motion to dissolve the stay and motion to dismiss the appeal filed on September 25, 2001, and interested person's (plaintiffs) emergency motion to modify and/or vacate (in part) the stay order filed on September 26, 2001, are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28th day of September, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pedeco, Inc. v. Mario Alonso Saenz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedeco-inc-v-mario-alonso-saenz-texapp-2001.