Home/Texas Supreme Court/Pecos Valley Southern Railway Co. v. Parkhill Produce Co.

Pecos Valley Southern Railway Co. v. Parkhill Produce Co.

352 S.W.2d 723, 163 Tex. 88, 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 69, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 622
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1961
DocketA-8616
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 352 S.W.2d 723 (Pecos Valley Southern Railway Co. v. Parkhill Produce Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pecos Valley Southern Railway Co. v. Parkhill Produce Co., 352 S.W.2d 723, 163 Tex. 88, 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 69, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 622 (Tex. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are in agreement with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 348 S.W. 2d 208, upon the points wherein there is conflict with the 1897 decision of the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals in First National Bank v. East, 43 S.W. 558. See, Middlebrook v. David Bradley Manufacturing Company, 86 Texas 706, 26 S.W. 935; Warner v. Gohlman, Lester & Co., 117 Texas 145, 298 S.W. 890; Id. Texas Civ. App., 8 S.W. 2d 1049; Stevens v. Willson, 120 Texas 584, 39 S.W. 2d 1088; Shafer v. Brashear, Texas Civ. App., 274 S.W. 229; Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Association of El Paso v. Anderson, Texas Civ. App., 88 S.W. 2d 499; Wolcott v. Hall, Texas Civ. App., 111 S.W. 2d 1140; Dickson v. Klett, Texas Civ. App., 211 S.W. 2d 381, mand. overr., 1 McDonald, Civil Procedure, 420, Sec. 4.38. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Opinion delivered October 18, 1961.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twyman v. Twyman
855 S.W.2d 619 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)
Mercantile Mortgage Co. v. University Homes, Inc.
663 S.W.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Renger Memorial Hospital v. State
585 S.W.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Cates v. Woody
557 S.W.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Winningham v. Connor
552 S.W.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Brazos Valley Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. Beavers
535 S.W.2d 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Von Scheele v. Kugler-Morris General Contractors, Inc.
532 S.W.2d 375 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Baxter v. Wetzel
511 S.W.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Beach City v. State ex rel. City of Baytown
473 S.W.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Nixon v. Rohrbach
438 S.W.2d 957 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
MacK Financial Corporation v. Gregg
435 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Burke v. Scott
400 S.W.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Wallace Investments, Inc. v. Blackstock
384 S.W.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Southwestern Investment Co. v. Lanier
372 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Duffy v. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation
366 S.W.2d 956 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 S.W.2d 723, 163 Tex. 88, 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 69, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pecos-valley-southern-railway-co-v-parkhill-produce-co-tex-1961.