Pecoraro v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
8 A.D.3d 1097, 778 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2004 NY Slip Op 5058, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8230
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., J.), entered October 3, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, reserved decision on defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pending plaintiffs’ compliance with defendant’s discovery demands.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Cobb v Kittinger, 168 AD2d 923 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J, Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pecoraro v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance, 8 A.D.3d 1097, 778 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2004 NY Slip Op 5058, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
8 A.D.3d 1097 (Pecoraro v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cobb v. Kittinger
168 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)