Pecker v. Pecker

240 So. 2d 528
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1970·No. No. 70-346·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment granting the appellee a divorce and denying her claim for alimony.

The sole question presented is whether the court er.red in taking jurisdiction of the parties-and subject matter. It is appellant’s contention that the appellee did not prove that he had become a bona fide resident of the state of Florida for six months last past prior to filing his complaint for divorce.

It is a well established rule of law that the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgment appealed must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pecker v. Pecker, 240 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

240 So. 2d 528 (Pecker v. Pecker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barwick Pacific Carpet Co. v. Kam Hawaii Construction, Inc.
630 P.2d 638 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1981)
Klarish v. Klarish
296 So. 2d 497 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Johansen
270 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)