Pecker v. Cannon & Scott's Administrators

11 Iowa 20
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 6, 1860·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wright J.

It was erroneous to substitute the administrators and continue the action as to them. The action then pending remained against Cannon but it was improper' [21] to unite with him defendants liable in a different capacity and against whom a different judgment, if any, would have to be rendered. The fact that the note was joint and several does not take the case out of the rule recognized in the case of Childs, Sanford & Co. v. John Hyde & Co., 10 Iowa 294. And see Wapello County v. Bigham, Administrator Ib. 39; Fink & Co. v. Taylor’s Administratrix, 4 G. Greene 196.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pecker v. Cannon & Scott's Administrators, 11 Iowa 20 (iowa 1860).

11 Iowa 20 (Pecker v. Cannon & Scott's Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braithwaite v. Aikin
48 N.W. 354 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)