Peckel v. Hakim

280 A.D.2d 656, 721 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1862

This text of 280 A.D.2d 656 (Peckel v. Hakim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peckel v. Hakim, 280 A.D.2d 656, 721 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine the rights and interests in a parcel of real property, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered February 25, 2000, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered thereon on March 24, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (see, Hakim v Peckel Family Ltd. Partnership, 280 AD2d 645 [decidedherewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Hakim v. Peckel Family Ltd. Partnership
280 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 656, 721 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peckel-v-hakim-nyappdiv-2001.